Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 11:32

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
NASA Is Planning to Build a Massive Telescope on the Moon’s Dark Side - The Daily Galaxy
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Just in the last 5 years:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
I convinced HP's board to buy Palm and watched them kill it - Hacker News
What’s next?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Trump’s FTC will approve an ad merger — with a gift to Elon Musk’s X - The Verge
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Is the Shia claim true that Imam Ali was born inside the Kaaba?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Why do I want to give up on men?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Why was Boromir corrupted by the One Ring, but not Faramir in The Lord of the Rings?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Thank you.
AMC Theaters to Run Even More Commercials Before Movies Play - Bloomberg.com
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.